Skip to main content

Christianity and State Power

 I woke up in the middle of the night and, unable to return to sleep, stumbled across this article on Facebook: https://www.politicalorphans.com/the-article-removed-from-forbes-why-white-evangelicalism-is-so-cruel/ (HT to Cameron McCoy for sharing that).

This line in particular struck me: "If all you knew about Christianity came from a close reading of the New Testament, you’d expect that Christians would be hostile to wealth, emphatic in protection of justice, sympathetic to the point of personal pain toward the sick, persecuted and the migrant, and almost socialist in their economic practices."

One of the major problems I have with the pro-birth movement (I refuse to call them pro-life, because most of them quit caring after birth) is their willingness to use state power to enforce their beliefs, which includes the prosecution of doctors (and eventually women, just you wait) for terminating pregnancies.  Many of the people in this movement also abhor using taxes to support the poor and underserved, and use the excuse that such things are why we have charities, and that Jesus intended for such supports to be provided willingly by local communities.  This, however, ignores the greater philosophical contradiction at play: they are willing to use the power of the state to force adherence to their religious doctrine in the case of policing women's bodies (when the Bible isn't terribly clear on the topic of abortion), but not so much when it comes to lifting up the poor (something the Bible is pretty damn clear on).  

Just a thought for the moment.  I'm probably going to come back to this when I'm in a less sleep deprived state.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What I Believe, Part 2 I've covered the philosophical underpinning, so let's talk application.  There's obviously a lot more to Kant's philosophy than what I wrote about in my last post, but I covered the parts that are important to me.  There are two big takeaways from all that: first, any rule you live by should be one you wouldn't mind everyone living by (meaning any action you justify taking should be one you would accept someone else doing to you), and second, every person is an end, not just a means.  The second part is a little complicated, but essentially, every person deserves to be dealt with as if they had worth in and of themselves and not as objects in your personal universe that only have worth in relation to their value to you. It's a simple idea that can be a little tough to put into simple language. So that's it.  That is the basis of how I navigate this crazy world, and how I evaluate another person's words and deeds.  Everythin...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Basic Lesson in Economics

  Well, I found my first topic.  Over the past few years, I've come to notice that people love posting memes that only sound good if you have zero education on the topic they address.  A lot of these focus on the topics of finance and economics.  Now, don't misunderstand me: both of these topics are chock full of some serious bullshit that seems purposefully designed to frustrate everyone, but there are some basic ideas about which some people are getting incredibly stupid. The most recent example is a tweet from some idiot going by Commie Warlock, who apparently thinks economics is magic.  It reads: "humans really made up paper money and to give it value said it's value was based on a metal which also has a made up value and then convinced everyone again that those made up values are constantly decreasing and that they determine whether or not a child can eat".  Holy shit.  I don't even know where to begin with this.   Okay, first, I'm glad ...
2 comments
Read more

The Atlanta Shooting - First order or second order racism?

 Here's one of the things that bothers me about the coverage of the Atlanta Shooting: it's being portrayed as a direct result of racism against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPI), but I'm bothered by that interpretation.  I don't have a determined position on this, but I'd like to hear any other perspectives that might clarify the situation.  The shooter targeted massage parlors, as part of his own crusade against sex work.  The fact that six of the eight people killed were Asian American women isn't a statistical fluke.  Massage parlors are frequently fronts for sex work, and the women employed in them are frequently trafficked from Asia to work there.  Given the shooter's stated motivation, it seems he was going after sex workers, rather than AAPI people.  The fact that these women were Asian didn't have anything to do with why they died, as a first order cause.  If the women working there had been African-American, or White, or Latinx...
Post a Comment
Read more